IBM's POWER7 system — arguably the most dramatic server design development since the first POWER4 dual-core microprocessor architecture — makes advanced virtualization stacks a core differentiator in creating next-generation workload-optimized systems architecture. However, for many I&O professionals, the feature and functions of microprocessors and/or microarchitectures won't be enough to put advanced virtualization stacks like POWER7 on their purchasing shortlists. Instead, you should seek the benefits of a balanced systems architecture design. IBM's clear leadership position in the traditional Unix area — coupled with its more advanced PowerVM virtualization stack — will continue to be the core reason to adopt IBM technology. The PowerVM stack also gives POWER7 advantages over other hypervisor-based systems alternatives and, most importantly, the ability to equally support complex, mixed-application workloads across multiple operating systems. And finally, another key component of short-listing POWER7 will be attacking the I&O objective of lowering the life-cycle costs in owning an enterprise computing footprint.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. What metrics should be used to measure advanced virtualization architectures?
2. What are the primary benefits of PowerVM running on Power Systems?
3. Which version of System Director's VMControl product is right for me?
4. What aspects of the new POWER7 systems functionality leverage PowerVM?
This is an excerpt
Buy Risk-Free
Price: US $499
Our Service Guarantee: If you are not completely satisfied with this document, notify Forrester within 24 hours of purchase for a full refund.
Already a Forrester Client? Log in to read this document.